Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Achievable agricultural soil carbon sequestration across Europe from country‐specific estimates

Leonor Rodrigues, Brieuc Hardy, Bruno Huyghebeart, Julia Fohrafellner, Dario Fornara, Gabriela Barančíková, Téresa G. Bárcena, Maarten De Boever, Claudia Di Bene, Dalia Feizienė, Thomas Kätterer, Péter László, Lilian O’Sullivan, Daria Seitz, Jens Leifeld

Global Change Biology · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systematic review of literature across 24 European countries assessed the feasibility of soil carbon sequestration as a climate mitigation strategy in agriculture. The authors found that whilst national SCS potentials varied considerably (0.1–27% of agricultural GHG emissions), none achieved the 4 per 1000 initiative's aspirational target, indicating that broader measures and implementation pathways are needed. The study emphasises that country-specific knowledge, harmonised methodologies, and standardised accounting frameworks are essential for improving SCS potential estimates across Europe.

UK applicability

The United Kingdom, as a participating European nation in such assessments, would be included in this pan-European analysis. The findings suggest that UK-specific SCS potentials depend on environmental conditions, agricultural practices, and measurement rigour; the call for methodological standardisation directly applies to UK soil carbon accounting and climate policy frameworks.

Key measures

Annual soil organic carbon (SOC) stock increase potential (expressed as percentage of agricultural GHG emissions that could be offset); country-specific SCS measures; tier-based complexity of measurement approaches (tier 1–3); controlling factors affecting SCS potential

Outcomes reported

The study evaluated country-specific soil carbon sequestration (SCS) potentials for 24 European countries, estimating that between 0.1% and 27% of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions could potentially be compensated annually through SCS measures. The analysis compared these findings against the aspirational 4 per 1000 initiative goal and identified methodological variations in SCS measurement approaches across nations.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1111/gcb.15897
Catalogue ID
BFmowc29uu-pwxume

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.