Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector

Mario Herrero, B. Henderson, Peter Havlík, Philip K. Thornton, Richard T. Conant, Pete Smith, Stefan Wirsenius, A.N. Hristov, Pierre Gerber, M. Gill, Klaus Butterbach‐Bahl, Hugo Valin, Tara Garnett, Elke Stehfest

Nature Climate Change · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systematic review, published in Nature Climate Change in 2016, synthesises evidence on greenhouse gas mitigation potentials across global livestock production. The authors evaluate technical mitigation options—including feed additives, improved genetics, grazing management, and manure handling—alongside their economic feasibility and implementation constraints. The review concludes that substantial emission reductions are technically achievable across livestock systems, though realisation depends critically on policy support, financial incentives, and overcoming geographically and systemically variable adoption barriers.

UK applicability

The findings are directly relevant to UK livestock policy and practice, particularly for dairy and intensive beef production systems. UK policymakers and farmers can draw on the reviewed mitigation options to inform climate commitments under the Climate Change Act and farming subsidy reform, though implementation barriers may differ from global averages.

Key measures

Greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials; economic feasibility of mitigation options; adoption constraints; emissions across different livestock production systems and geographies

Outcomes reported

The study synthesised evidence on technical mitigation options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions across global livestock production systems. It evaluated the economic feasibility and adoption constraints of various mitigation strategies across different production contexts and geographies.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Intensive livestock
DOI
10.1038/nclimate2925
Catalogue ID
BFmowc2b4w-jz9fu5

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.