Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

The potential for land sparing to offset greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture

Anthony Lamb, Rhys E. Green, Ian J. Bateman, Mark Broadmeadow, Toby J. A. Bruce, Jennifer Burney, Pete D. Carey, David R. Chadwick, Ellie Crane, Rob H. Field, K. W. T. Goulding, Howard Griffiths, Astley Hastings, Tim Kasoar, D. R. Kindred, Ben Phalan, John A. Pickett, Pete Smith, E. Wall, Erasmus K. H. J. zu Ermgassen, Andrew Balmford

Nature Climate Change · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This multidisciplinary review examines whether land sparing can serve as a meaningful climate mitigation strategy within agriculture. The authors synthesise evidence on emissions savings and ecological benefits from intensifying production on existing farmland to enable restoration of lower-productivity or marginal land as carbon sinks. The work addresses a central tension in sustainable agriculture: the extent to which productivity gains on existing land can offset sectoral emissions whilst simultaneously restoring natural carbon sinks.

UK applicability

Findings are directly applicable to UK policy and practice, as the research team is UK-based and the analysis likely considers British agricultural conditions and marginal land availability. The work informs UK climate policy on land use and agricultural intensification trade-offs.

Key measures

Greenhouse gas emission savings; carbon sequestration potential on liberated land; ecological outcomes from land restoration

Outcomes reported

The study synthesised evidence on the potential for agricultural land sparing—intensifying production on existing farmland to free marginal land for restoration or carbon sequestration—to offset greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector. The authors assessed both emissions reductions and ecological co-benefits of this approach.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review / synthesis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1038/nclimate2910
Catalogue ID
BFmowc2b4w-yhhz6y

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.