Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Health-motivated taxes on red and processed meat: a modelling study on optimal tax levels and health and climate-change co-benefits

Marco Springmann, Daniel Mason-D’Croz, Sherman Robinson, Keith Wiebe, H. Charles J. Godfray, Mike Rayner, Peter Scarborough

International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) · 2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This modelling study calculated economically optimal tax levels for red and processed meat in 149 world regions designed to internalise the health costs of consumption-related chronic disease. Using coupled comparative risk assessment and international economic data, the authors projected that optimal taxation would increase processed meat prices by 25% on average globally (ranging from 1% in low-income to over 100% in high-income countries) whilst increasing red meat prices by 4%, reducing processed meat consumption by 16%, and preventing approximately 222,000 deaths annually with USD 41 billion in health cost savings. The analysis presents taxation as a market-based policy mechanism for aligning private prices with societal health externalities arising from red and processed meat consumption.

UK applicability

The United Kingdom, as a high-income country, would likely experience above-average price increases under optimal taxation (potentially exceeding 100% for processed meat), placing it in a policy context where such measures could meaningfully reduce consumption and health burden from non-communicable diseases. The findings are directly relevant to UK policy debates on food taxation and public health nutrition strategy, though implementation would require consideration of domestic price elasticities, distributional impacts on lower-income households, and alignment with existing food policy frameworks.

Key measures

Optimal tax levels (% price increase); consumption changes (%); attributable mortality reduction (number and %); health cost savings (USD); health-related costs to society (USD); price elasticities; global comparative risk assessment outputs

Outcomes reported

The study modelled economically optimal tax levels for red and processed meat across 149 world regions and projected impacts on consumption, non-communicable disease mortality, and health costs. It estimated that optimal taxation would reduce processed meat consumption by 16% globally, prevent approximately 222,000 attributable deaths annually, and avert USD 41 billion in health costs.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Dietary patterns & chronic disease
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy modelling study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Intensive livestock
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0204139
Catalogue ID
BFmowc2i04-y1kvsj

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.