Summary
BACKGROUND The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has proposed a mandatory "Nutrition Info" label be placed on the front of packaged foods, showing whether products have low, medium, or high amounts of saturated fat, sodium, and added sugar. The agency has also considered a "High-In" labeling system, which would require labels on products with high levels of these nutrients. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to analyze the proportion of purchased packaged foods that would display specific front-of-package labels under the Nutrition Info and High-In front-of-package labeling systems overall and across 15 food groups. DESIGN This was a cross-sectional study of 1 year of sales data. SETTING This study used sales and nutrition data from 2022 from a supermarket chain with 184 stores in the Northeast U.S. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The sales-weighted percent of products that would display different Nutrition Info labels ("non-mixed:" all nutrients have the same level; "slightly mixed:" mix of low/medium or medium/high; "severely mixed:" a mix of low/high) and High-In labels (e.g., percent with ≥1 High-In label) was determined overall and by food group. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were calculated. RESULTS Under Nutrition Info labeling, 12% of products would display non-mixed labels and 40% would display severely mixed labels. In 7 food groups (e.g., pizza, candy), >50% of products would display severely mixed labels. Under High-In labeling, 49% of products would display ≥1 High-In label. CONCLUSIONS The Nutrition Info front-of-package label would place severely mixed labels on a large proportion of products in unhealthy food groups, which may confuse consumers. High-In front-of-package labeling would place labels on a large proportion of these products without mixed messaging.
Outcomes reported
Referenced by Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT as citation 21; likely supports topic area: front-of-package labelling / warning labels; supermarket placement / food retail environment. Topics: front-of-package labelling / warning labels; supermarket placement / food retail environment Evidence type: Research article / other Source report: Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT Ref#: Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT #21 Original: Petimar J, Hatton CR, Zhang Y, et al. Potential prevalence of frontof-package labels on packaged foods in a supermarket chain in the northeast United States under two proposed labeling systems. J Acad Nutr Diet 2025; 126: 156271.
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.