Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

The role of trade in the greenhouse gas footprints of EU diets

Sandstrom, V. et al

Global Food Security 19, 48-55 (2018) · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

International trade presents a challenge for measuring the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission footprint of human diets, because imported food is produced with different production efficiencies and sourcing regions differ in land use histories. We analyze how trade and countries of origin impact GHG footprint calculation for EU food consumption. We find that food consumption footprints can differ considerably between the EU countries with estimates varying from 610 to 1460 CO2-eq. cap−1 yr−1. These estimates include the GHG emissions from primary production, international trade and land use change. The share of animal products in the diet is the most important factor determining the footprint of food consumption. Embedded land use change in imports also plays a major role. Transition towards more plant-based diets has a great potential for climate change mitigation.

Outcomes reported

Referenced by Nature Reviews food production environment report as citation 9; likely supports topic area: land use / agriculture / food systems. Topics: land use / agriculture / food systems Evidence type: Research article / other Source report: Nature Reviews food production environment report Ref#: Nature Reviews food production environment report #9 Original: Sandstrom, V. et al. The role of trade in the greenhouse gas footprints of EU diets. Global Food Security 19, 48-55 (2018).

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Research
Source type
Peer-reviewed research
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/j.gfs.2018.08.007
Catalogue ID
IRmoq83nfn-9ce739
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.