Summary
Diet influences the composition, diversity, and functional capacity of the cattle gut microbiome. However, the extent to which feeding practices affect the microbial community and resistome under real-world conditions remains poorly understood, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. Here, we applied metagenomics to fecal samples from Bangladeshi cattle fed either a natural or a mixed diet to examine differences in microbial composition, functional potential, and resistome associated with feed type. Natural-fed cattle harbored higher microbial diversity and distinct bacterial phyla, including Bacteroidota, Campylobacteriota, and Mycoplasmatota. Acinetobacter, Aliarcobacter, Comamonas, Dysosmobacter, and Sharpea were enriched in natural-fed cattle, whereas Anaerotignum, Aristaeella, Oscillibacter, and Clostridium were more abundant in the mixed-fed group. Notably, the emerging zoonotic genus Aliarcobacter was detected in the natural-fed cohort. Alpha diversity analysis showed higher richness and evenness in natural-fed cattle, and a clear separation between dietary groups in beta diversity analysis (PERMANOVA, p = 0.01). Differential analysis identified Oscillibacter ruminantium as a biomarker of natural feeding, while Succinivibrio faecicola and Anaerovibrio slackiae for mixed feeding. Resistome profiles demonstrated clear differences. Mixed-fed cattle showed a consistent enrichment of tetracycline resistance genes, whereas the natural-fed group displayed a more variable resistome. Functional analysis suggested diet-associated differences in metabolic potential, with glutathione metabolism enriched in natural-fed cattle (p<0.05) and bile secretion and fatty acid metabolism moderately enriched in the mixed-fed group. These findings indicate that feeding practices are associated with differences in rumen microbial communities and resistome profiles in Bangladeshi cattle, providing baseline insights into microbiome-resistome relationships under field conditions.
Outcomes reported
Diet influences the composition, diversity, and functional capacity of the cattle gut microbiome. However, the extent to which feeding practices affect the microbial community and resistome under real-world conditions remains poorly understood, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. Here, we applied metagenomics to fecal samples from Bangladeshi cattle fed either a natural or a mixed diet to examine differences in microbial composition, functional potential, and resistome associated with feed type. Natural-fed cattle harbored higher microbial diversity and distinct bacterial phyla, including Bacteroidota, Campylobacteriota, and Mycoplasmatota. Acinetobacter, Aliarcobacter, Comamonas, Dysosmobacter, and Sharpea were enriched in natural-fed cattle, whereas Anaerotignum, Aristaeella, Oscillibacter, and Clostridium were more abundant in the mixed-fed group. Notably, the emerging zoonotic genus Aliarcobacter was detected in the natural-fed cohort. Alpha diversity analysis showed higher richness and evenness in natural-fed cattle, and a clear separation between dietary groups in beta diversity analysis (PERMANOVA, p = 0.01). Differential analysis identified Oscillibacter ruminantium as a biomarker of natural feeding, while Succinivibrio faecicola and Anaerovibrio slackiae for mixed feeding. Resistome profiles demonstrated clear differences. Mixed-fed cattle showed a consistent enrichment of tetracycline resistance genes, whereas the natural-fed group displayed a more variable resistome. Functional analysis suggested diet-associated differences in metabolic potential, with glutathione metabolism enriched in natural-fed cattle (p<0.05) and bile secretion and fatty acid metabolism moderately enriched in the mixed-fed group. These findings indicate that feeding practices are associated with differences in rumen microbial communities and resistome profiles in Bangladeshi cattle, providing baseline insights into microbiome-resistome relationships under field conditions.
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.