Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Advancing Soil Organic Carbon Prediction: A Comprehensive Review of Technologies, AI, Process-Based and Hybrid Modelling Approaches.

Ding Z, Liu K, Grunwald S, Smith P, Ciais P, Wang B, Wadoux AMJ, Ferreira C, Karunaratne S, Shurpali N, Yin X, Roberts D, Madgett O, Duncan S, Zhou M, Liu Z, Harrison MT.

Adv Sci (Weinh) · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This comprehensive review synthesises current approaches to predicting soil organic carbon, comparing technology-based methods, artificial intelligence, process-based and hybrid modelling paradigms. The authors evaluate the relative performance and limitations of each approach, with implications for improving soil carbon monitoring and modelling at field to global scales. The work appears to identify opportunities for integrating multiple methodologies to enhance prediction accuracy and applicability across varied soil and farming contexts.

UK applicability

The review's synthesis of prediction technologies and modelling approaches is directly applicable to UK soil carbon monitoring programmes, particularly in support of government commitments to soil health and agricultural emissions reduction. Methods and frameworks discussed could inform development of British soil monitoring networks and carbon accounting protocols.

Key measures

Soil organic carbon prediction accuracy; technology performance (remote sensing, proximal sensors, spectroscopy); AI model effectiveness; process-based model outputs; hybrid model integration

Outcomes reported

The study reviews and synthesises technologies, artificial intelligence methods, process-based models, and hybrid approaches for predicting soil organic carbon across diverse contexts. It evaluates the strengths, limitations and integrative potential of these methodologies.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Soil carbon measurement, modelling and quantification methodologies
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Comprehensive narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Arable cereals, mixed farming systems
DOI
10.1002/advs.202504152
Catalogue ID
NRmo3d4gae-082

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.