Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

A Review - Global Shift to Regenerative Agriculture

Mankotia Siya

JACS · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This narrative review examines the emerging global transition towards regenerative agriculture, synthesising evidence on the scale, geographic patterns, and drivers of this shift across farming systems. The paper likely evaluates reported benefits and challenges, contextualising regenerative practices within broader food systems change. As a 2025 review, it provides a contemporary assessment of how farming systems globally are moving away from conventional models towards regenerative approaches.

UK applicability

The findings are relevant to UK agricultural policy and practice, particularly given recent government emphasis on sustainable farming and environmental land management schemes. However, the global scope means UK-specific evidence may be limited and applicability will depend on how extensively UK case studies are integrated.

Key measures

Adoption trends, practice changes, geographic variation in regenerative agriculture uptake, reported outcomes across farming systems

Outcomes reported

The review synthesises evidence on the global shift towards regenerative agriculture, examining adoption patterns, drivers, and implications across diverse farming contexts. It likely documents changes in farming practices, adoption rates, and reported benefits or challenges associated with regenerative approaches worldwide.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Regenerative agriculture adoption and transition
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming systems
DOI
10.17303/jacs.2025.4.201
Catalogue ID
NRmo3d4gae-083

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.