Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agriculture: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Díaz-Rodríguez AM, Parra Cota FI, Cira Chávez LA, García Ortega LF, Estrada Alvarado MI, Santoyo G, de Los Santos-Villalobos S.

Plants (Basel) · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2025 review, authored by a consortium of Mexican and international researchers, synthesises current knowledge on microbial inoculants as tools for reducing dependence on synthetic agrochemicals in sustainable farming systems. It examines advances in the understanding of plant–microbe interactions, the performance of inoculants under field conditions, and the technical and regulatory obstacles that constrain their commercial deployment. The paper likely concludes with a forward-looking agenda identifying key gaps in formulation science, strain selection, and integration with existing agronomic practices.

UK applicability

Although the authorship and likely empirical context are centred on Mexico and Latin America, the principles and challenges discussed — including inoculant shelf-life, soil specificity, and regulatory frameworks — are broadly relevant to UK sustainable farming policy and the growing interest in biostimulants under post-Brexit agricultural transition.

Key measures

Inoculant efficacy indicators (crop yield, plant growth promotion); mechanisms of action (nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilisation, phytohormone production); adoption barriers; regulatory and formulation challenges

Outcomes reported

The review examines the efficacy, mechanistic basis, and limitations of microbial inoculants in agricultural settings, and outlines research priorities and practical pathways for their wider adoption. It likely assesses evidence across plant growth-promoting bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi, and related biological inputs in relation to crop productivity and soil health.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil microbiology & biological inputs
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Arable cereals
DOI
10.3390/plants14020191
Catalogue ID
NRmo3f02hq-002

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.