Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Comparative analysis of the quality and safety of crop production products obtained using organic and conventional agriculture technologies

A. N. Tokarev; A. S. Smolkina; T. V. Kalyuzhnaya; A. A. Terekhov

Legal regulation in veterinary medicine · 2026

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper, published in a Russian veterinary and agricultural law journal, offers a comparative analysis of crop product quality and safety under organic and conventional production technologies. It likely examines regulatory and scientific dimensions of food safety alongside quality metrics, reflecting the journal's interdisciplinary scope spanning veterinary medicine, agricultural regulation, and food safety. The findings are expected to contribute to the evidence base informing regulatory frameworks for organic certification and food safety standards in the Russian context.

UK applicability

The study is likely conducted within a Russian regulatory and agronomic context, meaning direct applicability to UK conditions is limited; however, the comparative quality and safety framework may offer transferable insights relevant to UK organic certification standards and post-Brexit food safety policy discussions.

Key measures

Pesticide residues (mg/kg); nitrate content (mg/kg); heavy metal concentrations (mg/kg); nutritional composition (vitamins, minerals); microbiological indicators

Outcomes reported

The study likely assessed physicochemical, microbiological, and contaminant parameters of crop products grown under organic and conventional systems, comparing nutritional quality indicators and food safety measures such as pesticide residues, nitrate content, and heavy metals.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Organic vs conventional production systems
Study type
Research
Study design
Comparative field study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Russia
System type
Arable cereals
DOI
10.52419/issn2782-6252.2025.4.155
Catalogue ID
NRmo3f02hq-035

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.