Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Beyond soil and yields: a systematic review of social capital’s role in regenerative agriculture

Bebyka Gaspar; Love-Lyne Moïse; Valdine Versaillot; Françoise Jean Baptiste; Pierre Darry Versaillot

Discover Agriculture · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systematic review investigates the role of social capital in shaping regenerative agriculture systems, moving beyond conventional metrics of soil health and yield to consider human and relational dimensions. By synthesising peer-reviewed literature, the authors likely identify how farmer networks, trust, and collaborative structures mediate the uptake and persistence of regenerative practices. The paper arguably contributes a socio-ecological framing to regenerative agriculture research, highlighting that transitions are not purely technical but are embedded in social relationships and institutional contexts.

UK applicability

Although the review appears international in scope, its findings on social capital — such as the importance of farmer peer networks and collective action — are broadly applicable to UK contexts, including agri-environment scheme participation, farming clusters, and the growing network of regenerative farming groups such as the Innovative Farmers network and FWAG.

Key measures

Social capital indicators (trust, network density, collective action participation); regenerative agriculture adoption rates; community resilience proxies; qualitative and quantitative outcomes across included studies

Outcomes reported

The review examines how social capital — including trust, networks, and collective action — influences the adoption, sustainability, and outcomes of regenerative agriculture practices. It likely synthesises evidence on how farmer relationships, peer learning, and community cohesion shape transitions beyond purely biophysical or productivity measures.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Farming systems & social-ecological transitions
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Regenerative agriculture (mixed systems)
DOI
10.1007/s44279-025-00405-2
Catalogue ID
NRmo3f02hq-06u

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.