Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

V-QBA vs. QBA—How Do Video and Live Analysis Compare for Qualitative Behaviour Assessment?

Andrew S. Cooke; Siobhan Mullan; C. Morten; Jo Hockenhull; M. R. F. Lee; L. M. Cardenas; M. Jordana Rivero

Frontiers in Veterinary Science · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Animal welfare is an inextricable part of livestock production and sustainability. Assessing welfare, beyond physical indicators of health, is challenging and often relies on qualitative techniques. Behaviour is a key component of welfare to consider and Qualitative Behaviour Assessment (QBA) aims to achieve this by systematically scoring behaviour across specific terms. In recent years, numerous studies have conducted QBA by using video footage, however, the method was not originally developed using video and video QBA (V-QBA) requires validation. Forty live QBAs were conducted, by two assessors, on housed beef cattle to help fill this validation gap. Video was recorded over the assessment period and a second video assessment was conducted. Live and video scores for each term were compare

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.3389/fvets.2022.832239
Catalogue ID
NRmo9rin9c-0wo
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.