Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewedConventional

Feed additives as a strategic approach to reduce enteric methane production in cattle: modes of action, effectiveness and safety

Mallory C. Honan; Xiaoyu Feng; J.M. Tricárico; E. Kebreab

Animal Production Science · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systematic review synthesised evidence on feed additives designed to mitigate enteric methane emissions from cattle, a major contributor to livestock greenhouse gas output. The authors evaluated additives operating through two mechanisms: direct inhibition of methanogenesis (3-nitroxypropanol, nitrates, macroalgae) and rumen environment modification (lipids, plant secondary compounds, essential oils). Efficacy varied considerably across additive types, with medium-chain and polyunsaturated fatty acids showing substantial promise but inconsistent results, whilst secondary plant compounds and essential oils demonstrated highly variable effects ranging from significant reductions to modest increases in emissions.

Regional applicability

These findings are relevant to UK cattle producers and policy-makers seeking to reduce farm greenhouse gas intensity, particularly given domestic and European regulatory pressure on emissions. The variable efficacy reported suggests that additive selection and formulation require careful consideration within specific production systems and nutritional contexts typical of UK dairy and beef operations.

Key measures

Enteric methane production (g/day); effectiveness of feed additives; modes of action (methanogenesis inhibition vs. rumen environment modification)

Outcomes reported

The review evaluated the efficacy and modes of action of various feed additives (3-nitroxypropanol, nitrates, halogenated compounds, lipids, and plant secondary compounds) in reducing enteric methane production in cattle based on in vivo studies. Results demonstrated variable effectiveness across additive classes, with some showing substantial reductions in daily methane output whilst others produced inconsistent outcomes.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Intensive livestock
DOI
10.1071/an20295
Catalogue ID
NRmo9rin9c-0zk

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.