Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Reducing Carbon Footprint of PET Films for Food Packaging Products Through Minimizing Solvent Consumptions

Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper addresses the environmental footprint of PET film production for food packaging by identifying solvent consumption as a significant contributor to manufacturing emissions. The authors propose and evaluate technical approaches to minimise solvent use during PET film manufacture, with the aim of reducing the overall carbon intensity of this widely-used packaging material. The work contributes to decarbonising the food supply chain infrastructure, particularly for fresh produce and prepared food distribution systems.

UK applicability

Findings are applicable to UK food packaging manufacturers and supply chains, as PET film is extensively used for UK fresh produce and prepared food distribution. Implementation would support UK net-zero commitments and circular economy objectives for food packaging.

Key measures

Carbon footprint (kg CO₂ equivalent or similar), solvent consumption (volume or mass), production efficiency metrics

Outcomes reported

The study evaluated methods to reduce solvent consumption during polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film manufacture and quantified the resulting decrease in carbon footprint of the packaging material. The research likely compared baseline solvent usage and associated emissions against optimised production scenarios.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Packaging materials and manufacturing emissions
Study type
Research
Study design
Technical process optimisation study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.52783/tjjpt.v45.i03.7826
Catalogue ID
NRmo9zxr64-05z

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.