Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Marie B. Demay; Anastassios G. Pittas; Daniel D. Bikle; Dima L. Diab; Máiréad Kiely; Marise Lazaretti‐Castro; Paul Lips; Deborah M. Mitchell; M. Hassan Murad; Shelley Powers; Sudhaker D. Rao; Robert Scragg; John A. Tayek; Amy M. Valent; Judith M. E. Walsh; Christopher R. McCartney

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

The panel suggests empiric vitamin D for those aged 1 to 18 years and adults over 75 years of age, those who are pregnant, and those with high-risk prediabetes. Due to the scarcity of natural food sources rich in vitamin D, empiric supplementation can be achieved through a combination of fortified foods and supplements that contain vitamin D. Based on the absence of supportive clinical trial evidence, the panel suggests against routine 25(OH)D testing in the absence of established indications. These recommendations are not meant to replace the current DRIs for vitamin D, nor do they apply to people with established indications for vitamin D treatment or 25(OH)D testing. Further research is needed to determine optimal 25(OH)D levels for specific health benefits.

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1210/clinem/dgae290
Catalogue ID
NRmo9zxr64-0a2
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.