Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows

Andrea Giustina; John P. Bilezikian; Robert A. Adler; Giuseppe Banfi; Daniel D. Bikle; Neil Binkley; Jens Bollerslev; Roger Bouillon; Maria Luisa Brandi; Felipe F. Casanueva; Luigi di Filippo; Lorenzo M. Donini; Peter R. Ebeling; Ghada El‐Hajj Fuleihan; Angelo Fassio; Stefano Frara; Glenville Jones; Claudio Marcocci; Adrian R. Martineau; Salvatore Minisola; Nicola Napoli; Massimo Procopio; René Rizzoli; Anne L. Schafer; Christopher T. Sempos; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Jyrki K. Virtanen

Endocrine Reviews · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

The 6th International Conference, "Controversies in Vitamin D," was convened to discuss controversial topics, such as vitamin D metabolism, assessment, actions, and supplementation. Novel insights into vitamin D mechanisms of action suggest links with conditions that do not depend only on reduced solar exposure or diet intake and that can be detected with distinctive noncanonical vitamin D metabolites. Optimal 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels remain debated. Varying recommendations from different societies arise from evaluating different clinical or public health approaches. The lack of assay standardization also poses challenges in interpreting data from available studies, hindering rational data pooling and meta-analyses. Beyond the well-known skeletal features, interest in vitamin D

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1210/endrev/bnae009
Catalogue ID
NRmo9zxr64-0a4
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.