Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Assessment of the Food–Energy–Water Nexus Considering the Carbon Footprint and Trade-Offs in Crop Production Systems in China

Beibei Guo; Xian Zou; Tingting Cheng; Yan Li; Jie Huang; Tingting Sun; Yi Tong

Land · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper establishes a food–energy–water–carbon (FEWC) measurement framework to assess trade-offs and synergies within Chinese crop production systems. Using carbon footprint analysis and energy decomposition methods across five crops over 2000–2022, the authors document significant fluctuations in sectoral emissions: notably declining food-system footprints, substantially increasing food–energy impacts, and fluctuating food–water footprints. The analysis reveals spatial efficiency improvements and a slight net mitigating effect from FEW nexus interactions on overall greenhouse gas emissions.

UK applicability

Whilst the specific findings are contextualised to China's geography and cropping patterns, the FEWC measurement methodology and decomposition approach may inform UK efforts to characterise resource-intensity trade-offs in crop production. However, China's spatial structure, energy mix, and water availability differ substantially from UK conditions, limiting direct applicability of provincial conclusions.

Key measures

Greenhouse gas emissions (carbon footprint); blue water consumption; energy consumption; logarithmic mean divisia index decomposition; spatial distribution indices along Hu Huanyong Line and Botai Line

Outcomes reported

The study quantified greenhouse gas emissions and trade-offs across food–energy–water systems in Chinese crop production from 2000–2022, revealing temporal and spatial patterns in carbon footprints and efficiency gains. Five crops were analysed to inform optimisation of cropping structure and resource use.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Research
Study design
Observational cohort / retrospective analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
China
System type
Arable cereals
DOI
10.3390/land14081674
Catalogue ID
NRmoh0e4lq-008

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.