Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

A commentary on key methodological developments related to nutritional life cycle assessment (nLCA) generated throughout a 6‐year strategic scientific programme

G. McAuliffe; T. Takahashi; M. Lee; A. Jebari; L. Cárdenas; A. Kumar; F. Pereyra-Goday; H. Scalabrino; A. L. Collins

Food and Energy Security · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This commentary from Rothamsted Research synthesizes methodological developments in nutritional life cycle assessment (nLCA) emerging from a 6-year strategic research programme. Drawing on high-resolution agronomical data from long-term experiments and the North Wyke Farm Platform, the authors document progress in integrating human nutrition outcomes with environmental footprinting across livestock, grassland and arable systems, whilst identifying co-benefits and trade-offs in efficient nutrient use. The work positions nLCA as an advancing methodology for evaluating sustainable food production and outlines future research directions across entire agri-food supply chains.

Regional applicability

This work is conducted at Rothamsted Research in the United Kingdom and utilises UK National Bioscience Research Infrastructure, making findings directly applicable to UK agricultural policy and practice. The methodological advances and long-term experimental data are particularly relevant for informing UK food system sustainability assessment and farm-level decision-making.

Key measures

Nutritional life cycle assessment (nLCA) methodology; environmental footprinting incorporating nutritional outcomes; nutrient use efficiency across scales from pot to landscape

Outcomes reported

This commentary synthesizes methodological progress in incorporating human nutrition into environmental footprinting through nutritional life cycle assessment (nLCA), drawing on 6 years of research across livestock, grassland and arable systems. The paper discusses advances in nLCA methodology and identifies future pathways for exploration across agri-food supply chains.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Commentary
Study design
Narrative review / Commentary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1002/fes3.480
Catalogue ID
NRmonp58y5-00a

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.