Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

A comparison of conventional and 137 Cs-based estimates of soil erosion rates on arable and grassland across lowland England and Wales

R. Evans, Adrian L. Collins, Y. Zhang, Ian Foster, J. Boardman, Hadewij Sint, Michael R. F. Lee, B. A. Griffith

Earth-Science Reviews · 2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Soils deliver a range of ecosystem services and underpin conventional global food production which must increase to feed the projected growth in human population. Although soil erosion by water and subsequent sediment delivery to rivers are natural processes, anthropogenic pressures, including modern farming practices and management, have accelerated soil erosion rates on both arable and grassland. A range of approaches can be used to assess and document soil erosion rates and, in the case of the UK, these mainly comprise the 137Cs-based approach, conventional surveys using volumetric measurements, integration of information on suspended sediment flux, fine sediment source apportionment and landscape sediment retention and traditional bounded hydrological monitoring at edge-of-field using

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.08.005
Catalogue ID
SNmoef2brr-6n56pu
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.