Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses

Ben Brumpton, Eleanor Sanderson, Karl Heilbron, Fernando Pires Hartwig, Sean Harrison, Gunnhild Åberge Vie, Yoonsu Cho, Laura D Howe, Amanda Hughes, Dorret I. Boomsma, Alexandra Havdahl, John L. Hopper, Michael C. Neale, Michel G. Nivard, Nancy L. Pedersen, Chandra A. Reynolds, Elliot M. Tucker–Drob, Andrew D. Grotzinger, Laurence J Howe, Tim Morris, Shuai Li, Ben Brumpton, Eleanor Sanderson, Karl Heilbron, Fernando Pires Hartwig, Sean Harrison, Gunnhild Åberge Vie, Yoonsu Cho, Laura D Howe, Amanda Hughes, Dorret I. Boomsma, Alexandra Havdahl, John L. Hopper, Michael C. Neale, Michel G. Nivard, Nancy L. Pedersen, Chandra A. Reynolds, Elliot M. Tucker–Drob, Andrew D. Grotzinger, Laurence J Howe, Tim Morris, Shuai Li, Adam Auton, Frank Windmeijer, Wei‐Min Chen, Johan Hå‌kon Bjø‌rngaard, Kristian Hveem, Cristen J. Willer, David M. Evans, Jaakko Kaprio, George Davey Smith, Bjørn Olav Åsvold, Gibran Hemani, Neil M. Davies, Karl Heilbron, Adam Auton, Adam Auton, Frank Windmeijer, Wei‐Min Chen, Johan Hå‌kon Bjø‌rngaard, Kristian Hveem, Cristen J. Willer, David M. Evans, Jaakko Kaprio, George Davey Smith, Bjørn Olav Åsvold, Gibran Hemani, Neil M. Davies

Nature Communications · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Estimates from Mendelian randomization studies of unrelated individuals can be biased due to uncontrolled confounding from familial effects. Here we describe methods for within-family Mendelian randomization analyses and use simulation studies to show that family-based analyses can reduce such biases. We illustrate empirically how familial effects can affect estimates using data from 61,008 siblings from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study and UK Biobank and replicated our findings using 222,368 siblings from 23andMe. Both Mendelian randomization estimates using unrelated individuals and within family methods reproduced established effects of lower BMI reducing risk of diabetes and high blood pressure. However, while Mendelian randomization estimates from samples of unrelated individuals sugge

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1038/s41467-020-17117-4
Catalogue ID
SNmohbb1x6-j9zrao
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.