Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Dynamics of Soil CH4 and CO2 Fluxes from Cattle Urine with and Without a Nitrification Inhibitor, and Dung Deposited onto a UK Grassland Soil

Jerry C. Dlamini, David Chadwick, Laura Cardenas

Methane · 2026

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Food production systems associated with livestock management are significant sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Livestock excreta are one of the primary sources of GHG emissions from grazing livestock. Against this context, a field experiment was established in a UK grassland to establish the extent of soil methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), andN2O fluxes upon the deposition of (i) cattle urine (U), (ii) urine + dicyandiamide (DCD) (U + DCD), (iii) artificial urine (AU), and dung (D), and compared with a (iv) control, where neither urine nor dung was applied. Excreta applications were made at three experimental periods during the grazing season: early-, mid-, and late-season. Soil N2O emissions data have been published already by co-authors; hence, this paper summarizes the emissions of

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.3390/methane5010004
Catalogue ID
SNmohdwk01-jmdlpr
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.