Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE)

Sinéad Langan, Sigrún Alba Jóhannesdóttir Schmidt, Kevin Wing, Véra Ehrenstein, Stuart G. Nicholls, Kristian B. Filion, Olaf H. Klungel, Irene Petersen, Henrik Toft Sørensen, William G Dixon, Astrid Guttmann, Katie Harron, Lars G. Hemkens, David Moher, Sebastian Schneeweiß, Liam Smeeth, Miriam Sturkenboom, Erik von Elm, Shirley Wang, Eric I. Benchimol

BMJ · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

In pharmacoepidemiology, routinely collected data from electronic health records (including primary care databases, registries, and administrative healthcare claims) are a resource for research evaluating the real world effectiveness and safety of medicines. Currently available guidelines for the reporting of research using non-randomised, routinely collected data—specifically the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) and the Strengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statements—do not capture the complexity of pharmacoepidemiological research. We have therefore extended the RECORD statement to include reporting guidelines specific to pharmacoepidemiological research (RECORD-PE). This article includes

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1136/bmj.k3532
Catalogue ID
SNmohi6en7-61iqut
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.