Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Nutritionism in a food policy context: the case of ‘animal protein’

Frédéric Leroy, Ty Beal, Pablo Gregorini, Graham A. McAuliffe, Stephan van Vliet

Animal Production Science · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Reductionist approaches to food focus on isolated nutritional criteria, ignoring the broader physiological and societal benefits and trade-offs involved. They can lead to the inadvertent or, potentially, intentional labelling of foods as good or bad. Both can be considered worrisome. Among our present-day array of issues is the disproportionate stigmatisation of animal-source foods as harmful for human and planetary health. The case for a protein transition reinforces this trend, overemphasising one particular nutritional constituent (even if an important one). In its strongest formulation, animal-source foods (reduced to the notion of ‘animal protein’) are represented as an intrinsically harmful food category that needs to be minimised, thereby falsely assuming that ‘proteins’ are nutriti

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1071/an21237
Catalogue ID
SNmohktxoo-2j9nsk
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.