Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Does grazing management provide opportunities to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants in pastoral ecosystems?

Ángel Sánchez Zubieta, Jean Víctor Savian, William de Souza Filho, Marcelo Wallau, Antonio Rosario Gómez, Jérôme Bindelle, Olivier Bonnet, Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho

The Science of The Total Environment · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This review examines whether grazing management interventions offer practical pathways to reduce methane emissions from ruminant livestock in pastoral farming systems. Drawing on evidence from multiple pastoral ecosystems, the authors assess the scope and limitations of management-based mitigation strategies—including rotational grazing, stocking rate adjustment, and herbage quality improvement—as complements to dietary or genetic approaches. The paper appears to conclude that grazing management holds promise, though its effectiveness depends on local context, forage availability, and integration with production objectives.

UK applicability

The findings are relevant to UK grassland-based beef and sheep production, where rotational grazing and stocking management are widely practised. However, the review likely includes evidence from diverse climates and forage types (tropical, Mediterranean, temperate); applicability to UK cool-season pastures and high-productivity systems requires careful interpretation of context-specific results.

Key measures

Methane emissions per animal or per unit production; grazing management variables (stocking density, rotational frequency, forage quality); pasture productivity and ecosystem impacts

Outcomes reported

The study examined whether grazing management practices—such as stocking rate, paddock rotation, and herbage allowance—can mitigate enteric methane emissions from grazing ruminants. It appears to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness and feasibility of management-based mitigation across pastoral ecosystems.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review or systematic literature review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Pasture-based livestock
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142029
Catalogue ID
SNmohku1sl-1n965j

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.