Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Giorgio Bogani, Violante Di Donato, Giovanni Scambia, Francesco Raspagliesi, Vito Chiàntera, Giulio Sozzi, Tullio Golia D’Augè, Ludovico Muzii, Pierluigi Benedetti Panici, Ottavia D’Oria, Enrico Vizza, Andrea Giannini, on behalf of The Investigators of the Italian Gynecological Cancer Study Group

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Radical hysterectomy and plus pelvic node dissection are the primary methods of treatment for patients with early stage cervical cancer. During the last decade, growing evidence has supported the adoption of a minimally invasive approach. Retrospective data suggested that minimally invasive surgery improves perioperative outcomes, without neglecting long-term oncologic outcomes. In 2018, the guidelines from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology stated that a "minimally invasive approach is favored" in comparison with open surgery. However, the phase III, randomized Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial questioned the safety of the minimally invasive approach. The LACC trial highlighted that the execution of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy correlates with a

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.3390/ijerph191811641
Catalogue ID
SNmoht1u9l-3ibo28
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.