Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Evaluation of the ECOSSE Model for Estimating Soil Respiration from Eight European Permanent Grassland Sites

Mohamed Abdalla, Iris Feigenwinter, Mark Richards, Sylvia H. Vetter, Georg Wohlfahrt, Ute Skiba, Krisztina Pintér, Zoltán Nagy, Stanislav Hejduk, Nina Buchmann, Paul Newell‐Price, Pete Smith

Agronomy · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This study used the ECOSSE model (v. 5.0.1) to simulate soil respiration (Rs) fluxes estimated from ecosystem respiration (Reco) for eight European permanent grassland (PG) sites with varying grass species, soils, and management. The main aim was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the model in estimating Rs from grasslands, and to gain a better understanding of the terrestrial carbon cycle and how Rs is affected by natural and anthropogenic drivers. Results revealed that the current version of the ECOSSE model might not be reliable for estimating daily Rs fluxes, particularly in dry sites. The daily estimated and simulated Rs ranged from 0.95 to 3.1 g CO2-C m−2, and from 0.72 to 1.58 g CO2-C m−2, respectively. However, ECOSSE could still be a valuable tool for predicting cumulativ

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.3390/agronomy13071734
Catalogue ID
SNmohxvl6c-5bhsvk
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.