Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Environmental Performance in the Production and Use of Recovered Fertilizers from Organic Wastes Treated by Anaerobic Digestion vs Synthetic Mineral Fertilizers

Axel Herrera, Giuliana D’Imporzano, Massimo Zilio, Ambrogio Pigoli, Bruno Rizzi, Erik Meers, Oscar Schouman, Micol Schepis, Federica Barone, Andrea Giordano, Fabrizio Adani

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Recovered fertilizers (RFs), in the form of digestate and digestate-derived ammonium sulfate, were produced from organic wastes by thermophilic anaerobic digestion (AD) at full scale. RFs were then used for crop production (maize), substituting synthetic mineral fertilizers (SFs). Environmental impacts due to both RF and SF production and use were studied by a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach using, as much as possible, data directly measured at full scale. The functional unit chosen was referred to as the fertilization of 1 ha of maize, as this paper intends to investigate the impacts of the use of RF (Scenario RF) for crop fertilization compared to that of SF (Scenario SF). Scenario RF showed better environmental performances than the system encompassing the production and use of ure

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07028
Catalogue ID
SNmohxvruy-x08b9r
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.