Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Humic field biostimulation as a sustainable agricultural practice to increase yield of main grains: evidence from on-farm trials

Juan Izquierdo, Osvin Arriagada, Gustavo García‐Pintos, Rodomiro Ortíz, Martín García‐Pintos, Marcelo García‐Pintos

Frontiers in Plant Science · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

The HB increased the average yield of all five crops. The overall mean yield response was significant, ranging from 7.6% to 15.7% for rice and maize, respectively. In barley, HB showed greater effectiveness at lower-yielding sites, reaching ~4 t ha<sup>-1</sup>. In rice, a tendency towards a greater impact on low- and high-yield OFTs was observed. In contrast, HB had a relatively constant effect on maize, wheat, and soybeans. Based on empirical data (normal scenario), the net economic returns varied from US $85.1 to $122.0 ha<sup>-1</sup> for wheat and maize, respectively. The probability of exceeding the break-even cost ranged from 83.4% to 89.1% for soybean and wheat, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that a single foliar application of HB at a critic

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.3389/fpls.2025.1709876
Catalogue ID
SNmoi53hj4-yp8xyb
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.