Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

How to evaluate sediment fingerprinting source apportionments

Pedro Velloso Gomes Batista, J. Patrick Laceby, Olivier Evrard

Journal of Soils and Sediments · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Abstract Purpose Evaluating sediment fingerprinting source apportionments with artificial mixtures is crucial for supporting decision-making and advancing modeling approaches. However, artificial mixtures are rarely incorporated into fingerprinting research and guidelines for model testing are currently lacking. Here, we demonstrate how to test source apportionments using laboratory and virtual mixtures by comparing the results from Bayesian and bootstrapped modeling approaches. Materials and methods Laboratory and virtual mixtures ( n = 79) with known source proportions were created with soil samples from two catchments in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Soil samples were sieved at 63 µm and analyzed for colorimetric and geochemical parameters. The MixSIAR Bayesian framework and a bootstrapp

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1007/s11368-022-03157-4
Catalogue ID
SNmois7v04-qayjly
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.