Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

A Large Genetic Causal Analysis of the Gut Microbiota and Urological Cancers: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study

Zhaofa Yin, Bohan Liu, Shijian Feng, Yushi He, Cai Tang, Pengan Chen, Xinyi Wang, Kunjie Wang

Nutrients · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This Mendelian randomisation study investigated causal relationships between specific gut microbial taxa and five urological cancers, addressing limitations of observational studies through genetic instrumental variable analysis. The authors identified distinct microbial associations for each cancer type—including taxa from Rikenellaceae, Ruminococcus, Oscillibacter, and other genera—and employed comprehensive sensitivity analyses to validate findings. The study provides genetic evidence for a role of the gut microbiota in urological cancer aetiology, though the mechanisms underlying these associations remain to be elucidated.

UK applicability

The findings are derived from UK Biobank data and are therefore directly relevant to UK population health and microbiota-cancer associations. These results could inform UK dietary and microbiota-targeted interventions for urological cancer prevention, though translation to clinical practice would require mechanistic studies and prospective validation.

Key measures

Genetic variants associated with gut microbial taxa (from MiBioGen consortium GWAS); genetic associations with urological cancers (from UK Biobank and FinnGen); Wald ratio and inverse variance weighted estimates; sensitivity analyses to test causal robustness

Outcomes reported

The study identified specific gut microbial taxa causally associated with five types of urological cancer (bladder, prostate, renal cell, renal pelvis, and testicular cancer) using Mendelian randomisation analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to confirm the robustness and reliability of the causal associations identified.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Gut microbiome & human health
Study type
Research
Study design
Two-sample Mendelian randomisation study with bidirectional analysis and sensitivity testing
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.3390/nu15184086
Catalogue ID
SNmoixnsmc-lwgn4z

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.