Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Genomic risk score offers predictive performance comparable to clinical risk factors for ischaemic stroke

Gad Abraham, Rainer Malik, Ekaterina Yonova-Doing, Agus Salim, Tingting Wang, John Danesh, Adam S. Butterworth, Joanna M. M. Howson, Michael Inouye, Martin Dichgans

Nature Communications · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Recent genome-wide association studies in stroke have enabled the generation of genomic risk scores (GRS) but their predictive power has been modest compared to established stroke risk factors. Here, using a meta-scoring approach, we develop a metaGRS for ischaemic stroke (IS) and analyse this score in the UK Biobank (n = 395,393; 3075 IS events by age 75). The metaGRS hazard ratio for IS (1.26, 95% CI 1.22-1.31 per metaGRS standard deviation) doubles that of a previous GRS, identifying a subset of individuals at monogenic levels of risk: the top 0.25% of metaGRS have three-fold risk of IS. The metaGRS is similarly or more predictive compared to several risk factors, such as family history, blood pressure, body mass index, and smoking. We estimate the reductions needed in modifiable risk f

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1038/s41467-019-13848-1
Catalogue ID
SNmoj443jx-ttppcx
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.