Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Recommendations for Increasing the Transparency of Analysis of Preexisting Data Sets

Sara J. Weston, Stuart J. Ritchie, Julia M. Rohrer, Andrew K Przybylski

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Secondary data analysis, or the analysis of preexisting data, provides a powerful tool for the resourceful psychological scientist. Never has this been more true than now, when technological advances enable both sharing data across labs and continents and mining large sources of preexisting data. However, secondary data analysis is easily overlooked as a key domain for developing new open-science practices or improving analytic methods for robust data analysis. In this article, we provide researchers with the knowledge necessary to incorporate secondary data analysis into their methodological toolbox. We explain that secondary data analysis can be used for either exploratory or confirmatory work, and can be either correlational or experimental, and we highlight the advantages and disadvant

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1177/2515245919848684
Catalogue ID
SNmoj7nwg1-a5ffgd
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.