Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Standardization and quality improvement of secondary prevention through cardiovascular rehabilitation programmes in Europe: The avenue towards EAPC accreditation programme: A position statement of the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC)

Ana Abreu, Ines Frederix, Paul Dendale, Arne Janssen, Patrick Doherty, Massimo Piepoli, Heinz Völler, Constantinos H. Davos, the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of EAPC Reviewers:, Marco Ambrosetti

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This position statement from the European Association of Preventive Cardiology's Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation section establishes a framework for standardising cardiovascular rehabilitation programmes across European centres. The document defines evidence-based minimal and optimal standards alongside quality indicators, addressing persistent heterogeneity in service delivery and gaps in referral, uptake, and adherence. The authors propose that compliance with these standards will enhance programme quality and consistency across Europe.

UK applicability

UK cardiovascular rehabilitation services would benefit from alignment with these European standards and quality indicators, potentially improving consistency across National Health Service trusts and independent providers. The framework may inform UK policy and service specification for secondary prevention programmes.

Key measures

Cardiovascular rehabilitation standards (minimal and optimal); quality indicators; programme standardisation compliance metrics; referral rates; uptake and adherence to rehabilitation

Outcomes reported

The paper defines minimal and optimal cardiovascular rehabilitation standards and describes relevant quality indicators for cardiovascular rehabilitation programmes across European centres. It reports on compliance metrics and standardisation pathways to improve programme quality and patient outcomes.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Dietary patterns & chronic disease
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1177/2047487320924912
Catalogue ID
SNmojbiq8m-lb3gfi

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.