Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 2 — RCT / large cohortPeer-reviewed

STICH3C: Rationale and Study Protocol

Stephen E. Fremes, Guillaume Marquis‐Gravel, Mario Gaudino, E. Marc Jolicoeur, Sylvain Bédard, Ruth Masterson Creber, Marc Ruel, Dominique Vervoort, Harindra C. Wijeysundera, Michael E. Farkouh, Jean‐Lucien Rouleau, Reena Karkhanis, Rakesh C. Arora, Michelle M. Graham, Jeff S. Healey, Jonathan G. Howlett, Alex Kiss, Dennis T. Ko, Doug Lee, Michael McGillion, Louise Y. Sun, Richard H. Swartz, Pierre Voisine, Jeroen J. Bax, Filippo Crea, Torsten Doenst, Sanjit S. Jolly, L Koeber, André Lamy, Alexandra J. Lansky, Peter van der Meer, Milan Milojevic, Elmir Ömerovic, Mark Petrie, Christopher M. Reid, Sigrid Sandner, Miguel Sousa‐Uva, Eric J. Velazquez, Subodh Verma, Gregg W. Stone, John Spertus.

Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

STICH3C is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction and multivessel coronary artery disease. The trial aims to enrol 754 participants across approximately 45 international centres with 4–5 years median follow-up, directly addressing the evidence gap regarding optimal revascularisation strategy in this population. Results will inform clinical practice, patient decision-making, and international guideline development regarding efficacy and safety of PCI versus CABG in advanced ischaemic heart disease.

UK applicability

As an international multicentre trial including Canadian and European sites, findings will be directly applicable to UK cardiovascular practice and guideline development by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the British Cardiovascular Society. The trial's comparison of contemporary PCI techniques with CABG will inform treatment pathways for UK patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Key measures

Time-to-event analysis for composite endpoint (death, stroke, MI, urgent revascularisation, HF readmission); time to death; hospitalisation frequency for heart failure; major adverse events; quality-of-life measures; health economic data

Outcomes reported

The study measures a composite primary endpoint of death from any cause, stroke, spontaneous myocardial infarction, urgent repeat revascularisation, or heart failure readmission. Secondary outcomes include time to death, frequency of heart failure hospitalisations, major adverse events, disease-specific quality of life, and health economics measures.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Dietary patterns & chronic disease
Study type
Research
Study design
RCT
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1161/circinterventions.122.012527
Catalogue ID
SNmojj1loj-rwukee

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.