Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Enhancing soil health and nutrient cycling through soil amendments: Improving the synergy of bacteria and fungi

Yanhong Ding, Xiaodong Gao, Duntao Shu, Kadambot H. M. Siddique, Xiaolin Song, Pute Wu, Changjian Li, Xining Zhao

The Science of The Total Environment · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2024 paper, published in The Science of The Total Environment, investigates how soil amendments can enhance soil health by promoting synergistic interactions between bacterial and fungal communities. As suggested by the title, the authors appear to argue that improved bacterial–fungal collaboration under amendment regimes enhances key nutrient cycling processes. The work addresses a recognised gap in understanding how soil microbiota coordination influences both soil function and, by extension, crop nutrient availability.

UK applicability

Findings on soil amendment strategies and microbial management may be relevant to UK arable and mixed farming systems, particularly where soil degradation or low organic matter is a constraint. However, applicability depends on whether the study conditions (climate, soil type, amendment types) align with UK temperate conditions; this should be verified against the full paper.

Key measures

Likely measures include bacterial and fungal abundance and diversity (via molecular profiling), nutrient concentration (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium), enzyme activity involved in nutrient cycling, and soil respiration or carbon mineralisation rates.

Outcomes reported

The study examined how soil amendments enhance the synergistic interactions between soil bacteria and fungi, and their effects on nutrient cycling processes. Outcomes likely included measures of microbial community composition, nutrient availability, and metabolic activity under amended versus control conditions.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial or laboratory experiment
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171332
Catalogue ID
SNmojuonxv-i37tmu

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.