Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewedConventional

Microbial Interactions Within Multiple-Strain Biological Control Agents Impact Soil-Borne Plant Disease

Ben Niu, Weixiong Wang, Zhibo Yuan, Ronald R. Sederoff, Heike Sederoff, Vincent L. Chiang, Rainer Borriss

Frontiers in Microbiology · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This narrative review examines the use of single and multiple-strain microbial consortia as biological control agents against soil-borne plant diseases in agriculture and forestry. The authors synthesise current understanding of the mechanisms by which bacterial and fungal biocontrol agents suppress pathogens, identify key interaction-related factors that affect consortium efficacy, and propose a reductionist synthetic community approach for rational assembly of multi-strain consortia to overcome barriers such as inadequate host colonisation and inefficient pathogen inhibition in complex rhizosphere environments.

Regional applicability

The findings are applicable to UK crop and forestry production systems where soil-borne diseases threaten yield and quality. The proposed consortia approach and assembly workflow could inform development of microbial biocontrol products for UK growers seeking environmentally friendly alternatives to chemical disease management, though field validation under UK soil and climatic conditions would be required.

Key measures

Disease-suppressive efficacy of biocontrol agents; mechanisms of pathogen inhibition; colonisation capacity of host plants; microbial interactions within consortia

Outcomes reported

The paper summarises current evidence on single-strain and multi-strain biological control consortia used to manage soil-borne plant diseases, and discusses the mechanisms by which microbial components improve disease suppression efficacy. It proposes a reductionist synthetic community approach for assembling multiple-strain biological control consortia.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.3389/fmicb.2020.585404
Catalogue ID
SNmojyxw4d-ngol03

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.