Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Hazard of polystyrene micro-and nanospheres to selected aquatic and terrestrial organisms

Ruxia Qiao, Monika Mortimer, Jelizaveta Richter, Bárbara Rani-Borges, Zhenyang Yu, Margit Heinlaan, Sijie Lin, Angela Ivask

The Science of The Total Environment · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systematic review synthesised toxicological data from 294 studies on polystyrene micro- and nanospheres to advance hazard assessment of plastics contamination. Aquatic invertebrates were the most extensively studied, whilst nanosized particles received more attention than microsized variants, and approximately 40% of available data reported no organismal effects. The authors highlight critical research gaps—particularly the need for environmentally relevant concentrations, broader organism coverage, co-exposure studies, and improved methods for plastic identification and bioaccumulation assessment.

Regional applicability

The findings are directly relevant to UK environmental regulation and risk assessment of plastic contamination in freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. The identified gaps in bioaccumulation data and co-exposure studies should inform UK and EU research priorities and policy development around microplastics monitoring and regulatory limits.

Key measures

Toxicity endpoints across multiple organism groups; prevalence of acute vs. chronic exposure studies; frequency of no-effect findings; study distribution by organism type and particle size; identification of toxicity mechanisms

Outcomes reported

A systematic analysis of 294 peer-reviewed papers on polystyrene micro- and nanosphere toxicity across microorganisms, aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates, fish, and higher plants. The review identified research gaps, exposure patterns, and knowledge distributions across organism types and exposure scenarios.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Pesticides, contaminants & food safety
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158560
Catalogue ID
SNmok1wbgu-wc07jp

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.