Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

How to transition to reduced-meat diets that benefit people and the planet

Niki Rust, Lucy E. Ridding, Caroline Ward, Beth Clark, Laura Kehoe, Manoj Dora, Mark J. Whittingham, Philip J.K. McGowan, Abhishek Chaudhary, Christian Reynolds, Chet Trivedy, Nicola West

The Science of The Total Environment · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Overwhelming evidence shows that overconsumption of meat is bad for human and environmental health and that moving towards a more plant-based diet is more sustainable. For instance, replacing beef with beans in the US could free up 42% of US cropland and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 334 mmt, accomplishing 75% of the 2020 carbon reduction target. We summarise the evidence on how overconsumption of meat affects social, environmental and economic sustainability. We highlight the social, environmental and economic effectiveness of a range of dietary interventions that have been tested to date. Because meat eating is embedded within complex cultural, economic, and political systems, dietary shifts to reduce overconsumption are unlikely to happen quickly and a suite of sustained, context-s

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137208
Catalogue ID
SNmokbvpc3-4bl9g8
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.