Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: lessons learned and ways forward

Måns Nilsson, Elinor Chisholm, David Griggs, Philippa Howden‐Chapman, David McCollum, Peter Messerli, Barbara Neumann, Anne‐Sophie Stevance, Martin Visbeck, Mark Stafford‐Smith

Sustainability Science · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper addresses a critical gap in SDG research and policy by synthesising a framework for systematically assessing interactions between sustainable development goals, distinguishing between trade-offs and co-benefits. Through case study analysis of health, energy and ocean sectors, the authors demonstrate that SDG interactions are highly context-dependent, shaped by geography, resources, timescales and governance structures. The work proposes a global SDG Interactions Knowledge Platform as a mechanism to integrate scientific research and policy-making in pursuit of coherent sustainable development action.

UK applicability

The framework and interaction-mapping methodology could inform UK policy integration across health, energy and environmental governance, particularly in assessing how nutrition and food system policies interact with broader SDG commitments. However, the abstract does not detail UK-specific applications or outcomes.

Key measures

Typology and characterisation of SDG interactions; analysis of contextual factors (geographical context, resource endowments, time horizon, governance) affecting interaction patterns

Outcomes reported

The study applied a conceptual framework for systematically mapping and characterising interactions (trade-offs and co-benefits) between sustainable development goals, drawing on case studies in health, energy and ocean sectors. The analysis identified key contextual factors that determine how SDG interactions manifest across different geographical and governance settings.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food & agricultural policy
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Other
DOI
10.1007/s11625-018-0604-z
Catalogue ID
SNmokbvwjk-tmp124

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.