Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain

Rosanna Lane, Gemma Coxon, Jim Freer, Thorsten Wagener, Penny J Johnes, John P. Bloomfield, Sheila Greene, C. J. A. Macleod, Sim Reaney

Hydrology and earth system sciences · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Abstract. Benchmarking model performance across large samples of catchments is useful to guide model selection and future model development. Given uncertainties in the observational data we use to drive and evaluate hydrological models, and uncertainties in the structure and parameterisation of models we use to produce hydrological simulations and predictions, it is essential that model evaluation is undertaken within an uncertainty analysis framework. Here, we benchmark the capability of several lumped hydrological models across Great Britain by focusing on daily flow and peak flow simulation. Four hydrological model structures from the Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE) were applied to over 1000 catchments in England, Wales and Scotland. Model performance was then evalu

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.5194/hess-23-4011-2019
Catalogue ID
SNmokeh0oc-qtid6z
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.