Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Machine learning assisted hybrid models can improve streamflow simulation in diverse catchments across the conterminous US

Goutam Konapala, Shih‐Chieh Kao, Scott Painter, Dan Lu

Environmental Research Letters · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Incomplete representations of physical processes often lead to structural errors in process-based (PB) hydrologic models. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can reduce streamflow modeling errors but do not enforce physical consistency. As a result, ML algorithms may be unreliable if used to provide future hydroclimate projections where climates and land use patterns are outside the range of training data. Here we test hybrid models built by integrating PB model outputs with a ML algorithm known as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network on their ability to simulate streamflow in 531 catchments representing diverse conditions across the Conterminous United States. Model performance of hybrid models as measured by Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) improved relative to standalone PB and LSTM models

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1088/1748-9326/aba927
Catalogue ID
SNmokeh51n-n3zfii
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.