Summary
Abstract We build three long short‐term memory (LSTM) daily streamflow prediction models (deep learning networks) for 531 basins across the contiguous United States (CONUS), and compare their performance: (1) a LSTM post‐processor trained on the United States National Water Model (NWM) outputs (LSTM_PP), (2) a LSTM post‐processor trained on the NWM outputs and atmospheric forcings (LSTM_PPA), and (3) a LSTM model trained only on atmospheric forcing (LSTM_A). We trained the LSTMs for the period 2004–2014 and evaluated on 1994–2002, and compared several performance metrics to the NWM reanalysis. Overall performance of the three LSTMs is similar, with median NSE scores of 0.73 (LSTM_PP), 0.75 (LSTM_PPA), and 0.74 (LSTM_A), and all three LSTMs outperform the NWM validation scores of 0.62. Addi
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.