Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Discriminating among interpretations for the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2900</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math> states

Timothy J. Burns, Eric S. Swanson

Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

We make predictions for the production and decays of $X(2900)$ states, and their possible charged partners, in ${B}^{+}$ and ${B}^{0}$ decays, considering a number of competing models for the states, including triangle diagrams mediated by quark exchange or pion exchange, and resonance scenarios including molecules and tetraquarks. Assuming only isospin symmetry and the dominance of color-favored weak decays, we find characteristic differences in the predictions of the different models. Future experimental studies can therefore discriminate among the competing interpretations for the states.

Source type
Peer-reviewed study
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.103.014004
Catalogue ID
SNmokymtqv-1xtee3
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.