Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Microbial secondary metabolites for modulating plant biotic stress resistance: Bridging the lab-field gap

Reza Fauzi Dwisandi, Mia Miranti, Ani Widiastuti, Dedat Prismantoro, Muhammad Adil Awal, Muhamad Shakirin Mispan, Ravindra Chandra Joshi, Febri Doni

Plant Stress · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This narrative review synthesises evidence on microbial secondary metabolites as biological control agents against biotic stressors in crops. Whilst laboratory studies demonstrate promise for microbial inoculants in enhancing plant stress tolerance, the authors identify a critical gap: field performance remains inconsistent and unpredictable. The review emphasises the need for bridging this lab-field divide and explores whether combining microbial extracts with inoculants could improve effectiveness in practical agricultural contexts.

Regional applicability

The review's findings are globally relevant but require contextualisation for United Kingdom conditions. Adoption of microbial inoculants in UK farming would depend on understanding performance under temperate climate conditions, soil types, and typical crop management systems—data which this review suggests remain limited. Transfer of recommendations would require field validation trials in UK agricultural environments.

Key measures

Comparative effectiveness of microbial agents in secondary metabolite production; plant tolerance to biotic stress; consistency of microbial performance across lab and field environments

Outcomes reported

This review examined the comparative effectiveness of microbial secondary metabolites in enhancing plant tolerance to biotic stress (pests, diseases, weeds) across laboratory and field settings. The study evaluated whether microorganisms produce consistent secondary metabolites and maintain comparable efficacy between controlled and field conditions.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1016/j.stress.2024.100720
Catalogue ID
SNmomgwvub-y3lebu

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.