Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

BIS-4D: mapping soil properties and their uncertainties at 25 m resolution in the Netherlands

Anatol Helfenstein, Vera Leatitia Mulder, M.J.D. Hack‐ten Broeke, Maarten van Doorn, Kees Teuling, D.J.J. Walvoort, G.B.M. Heuvelink

Earth system science data · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

BIS-4D is a machine learning-informed soil mapping platform for the Netherlands that produces high-resolution (25 m) three-dimensional maps of seven key soil properties and their associated uncertainties to 2 m depth, informed by up to 950,000 soil observations and 366 environmental covariates. The platform additionally maps temporal changes in soil organic matter from 1953 to 2023. Prediction accuracy was property-dependent, with clay, sand and pH performing well (MEC ≥0.6) but phosphorus remaining difficult to predict reliably, highlighting both the utility and limitations of national-scale digital soil mapping.

Regional applicability

This study was conducted in the Netherlands and therefore does not directly address United Kingdom soil conditions or policy, though the methodological approach and machine learning framework may be transferable to UK soil mapping initiatives. The spatial resolution (25 m) and depth range (0–2 m) provide a benchmark for comparable national soil mapping efforts in the UK context.

Key measures

Soil texture (clay, silt, sand content), bulk density, pH, total nitrogen, oxalate-extractable phosphorus, cation exchange capacity, soil organic matter; model efficiency coefficient (MEC); prediction interval coverage probability; 10-fold cross-validation results

Outcomes reported

The study delivered high-resolution maps (25 m resolution) of eight key soil properties and their uncertainties across 0–2 m depth in three-dimensional space, plus temporal maps of soil organic matter between 1953 and 2023. Prediction accuracy varied by property, with clay, sand and pH showing highest accuracy (MEC 0.6–0.92), whilst oxalate-extractable phosphorus was most difficult to predict (MEC −0.11 to 0.38).

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Soil health assessment & monitoring
Study type
Research
Study design
Spatial mapping and modelling study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Netherlands
System type
Other
DOI
10.5194/essd-16-2941-2024
Catalogue ID
SNmomgy1pt-njwtjq

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.