Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Carbon supply elasticity and determinants of farmer carbon farming decisions

Tong Wang, Hailong Jin, David E. Clay, Heidi L. Sieverding, Stephen Cheye

Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2024 analysis of a 2021 U.S. Midwest farmer survey quantifies the price elasticity of carbon farming adoption and identifies the farm and farmer attributes that determine participation across different price regimes. The findings demonstrate that carbon supply responds elastically only within an intermediate price band ($20–50/Mg), whilst at lower and higher prices participation becomes inelastic, with different drivers—co-benefits dominating at low prices and farmer demographics and soil quality at higher prices. These results suggest that policy interventions to boost carbon farming adoption should be tailored to price level, balancing economic incentives with co-benefit communication and uncertainty reduction.

UK applicability

Whilst the study focuses on U.S. Midwest farming systems and market conditions, the methodological framework for understanding price elasticity and heterogeneous farmer responses could inform UK carbon farming policy design, particularly schemes under the Environmental Land Management framework. UK applicability would depend on whether price ranges, co-benefits profile, and farmer demographics in schemes translate comparably to Midwest conditions.

Key measures

Willingness to accept (WTA) payment for carbon farming; price elasticity of carbon supply at three price bands ($10–20, $20–50, $50–70 per Mg); farmer demographic variables (age, education); farm characteristics (size, soil quality); perceived co-benefits

Outcomes reported

The study measured farmers' willingness to accept (WTA) payment for carbon sequestration at different price points and identified which farmer and farm characteristics influence participation decisions. Price elasticity of carbon supply varied significantly across price ranges, with differential influences of co-benefits versus structural farm variables.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Research
Study design
Observational survey
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1002/aepp.13442
Catalogue ID
SNmoqqscsj-5m3kuf

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.