Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Which soil microbial indicators should be included in routine laboratory tests to support the transition to sustainable management of arable farming systems? A meta-analysis

Elodie Cusset, Nadia Bennegadi-Laurent, Sylvie Recous, Pierre-Yves Bernard, Anne‐Sophie Perrin, Romain Tscheiller, Isabelle Trinsoutrot‐Gattin, Wassila Riah‐Anglet

Ecological Indicators · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This meta-analysis of 166 peer-reviewed articles examined the sensitivity of soil microbiological and physico-chemical indicators to six sustainable farming practices in arable systems. The authors found that soil clay content, organic matter, pH, trial duration and sampling depth significantly modulate indicator responses, whilst climatic factors did not. Both physico-chemical and microbiological indicators were sensitive to organic matter input, residue retention, cover crops and reduced tillage, with cover cropping producing notably strong responses (SOC +7%, STN +8%, MBC +14%, PLFA +19%, β-GLU +11%), whereas crop rotation and organic conversion showed microbiological but not organic carbon responses.

UK applicability

The findings on indicator sensitivity to sustainable farming practices are broadly applicable to UK arable systems, though UK conditions (typically cooler, wetter, and with variable soil textures) would be represented within the meta-analysis's pedoclimatic range. The recommendation to integrate microbiological indicators into routine soil testing could inform UK advisory frameworks and agri-environment monitoring schemes.

Key measures

Soil organic carbon (SOC), soil total nitrogen (STN), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), total phospholipids fatty acids (PLFA), β-glucosidase (β-GLU) activity; response ratios across exogenous organic matter input, crop residue retention, cover crops, crop rotation/diversification, tillage reduction, and conversion to innovative/organic systems

Outcomes reported

The study quantified the sensitivity of soil microbiological indicators (microbial biomass carbon, phospholipid fatty acids, β-glucosidase) and physico-chemical measures to six sustainable farming practices across 166 articles. It identified which indicators respond to specific management transitions and which soil, climate and methodological factors modulate these responses.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Meta-analysis
Study design
Meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Arable cereals
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112706
Catalogue ID
SNmoqqsg0s-x3dt9c

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.