Summary
This article critiques the dominant productionist paradigm in global food systems, proposing that its apparent successes mask fundamental structural vulnerabilities. The authors conceptualise the world's interwoven food systems as a centre–periphery constellation where peripheral nations' resilience is systematically undermined by dependence on key exporting countries and transnational corporations. The paper argues that increasing crisis vulnerability is inherent to tightly networked global food systems and offers a transition pathway centred on building agency and transformative resilience among currently peripheral actors.
UK applicability
The United Kingdom, as a developed economy integrated into global supply chains, occupies a relatively central position in this network; however, UK food security remains exposed to disruptions in supply chains for key commodities. The framework may inform UK policy discussions on food system resilience, import dependency for fresh produce and grains, and the potential for more localised or diversified sourcing strategies.
Key measures
Structural analysis of global food system networks; characterisation of centre–periphery dynamics; assessment of food system resilience and crisis vulnerability
Outcomes reported
The study conceptualised the global food system as a centre–periphery network structure and identified how productionist success creates inherent vulnerability to food crises. It proposed a transformation pathway based on 'next best transition steps' to build agency and resilience in peripheral food systems.
Topic tags
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.