Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Shift in beneficial interactions during crop evolution

Hélène Fréville, Germain Montazeaud, Emma Forst, Jacques David, Roberto Papa, Maud I. Tenaillon

Evolutionary Applications · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This narrative review examines how human–crop co-evolution has reshaped beneficial ecological interactions within agroecosystems, particularly between crops and their microbial partners. Domestication and modern breeding have generally reduced benefits from niche partitioning and facilitation through decreased diversity, mass selection, and increased chemical inputs that have relaxed selection for nutrient-mobilising traits. The authors propose that agroecological practices and strategic crop breeding can deliberately restore these interactions by mobilising genetic and ecological diversity.

UK applicability

The findings are applicable to UK agriculture, where cereals and mixed cropping dominate and intensive breeding has long prioritised yield. UK farming policy increasingly supports agroecological transitions and soil health; this review provides a mechanistic framework for understanding how crop breeding and diversity management can restore beneficial microbe interactions relevant to UK soil and plant health targets.

Key measures

Qualitative assessment of molecular and functional diversity in agroecosystems; trends in plant–plant and plant–microbe interaction benefits; selection pressures on root exudation and nutrient-exchange traits

Outcomes reported

The narrative review synthesised evidence on how domestication and modern breeding have reduced beneficial crop–microbe interactions through decreased diversity, mass selection, and chemical inputs that relax selection for nutrient-mobilising traits. The authors identified mechanisms (niche partitioning, facilitation, kin selection) and proposed breeding and agroecological strategies to restore these interactions.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1111/eva.13390
Catalogue ID
SNmov0hb7d-ad27pu

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.